Back to Articles
ONCA Confirms Absurdity of Superior Court's Rule 9 Interpretation
2015-10-20
By: Kadey Schultz
Connect with this Lawyer:
 
Share This
Article Summary
With a unanimous 3-0 decision, the Court of Appeal confirms that heavy commercial vehicle insurers only pay loss transfer to insurers of vehicles with which they actually collide under Rules 9 and 11 of the Fault Determination Rules.

In State Farm v. Old Republic, 2015 ONCA 669, Justice Simmons' reasons confirm that it is absurd to interpret Rule 9(4) to mean that a heavy commercial vehicle is liable for loss transfer to the insurer of every other non-heavy commercial vehicle involved in a chain reaction accident.

The Court of Appeal agreed with Old Republic's position that the word "incident" as it appears in sub-clauses (a) and (b) of s. 9 of the FDRs refers only to the described collision in the particular sub-clause and not the entire chain reaction accident as a whole.

We are thrilled to have successfully overturned the prior Arbitration and Superior Court Appeal decisions  - securing an important result for heavy commercial insurers and the trucking industry in Ontario. Otherwise, heavy commercial vehicle insurers would face virtually unlimited claims for loss transfer, without any policy limits, if involved in multiple vehicle pile up accidents.

Read the entire decision here: http://www.ontariocourts.ca/decisions/2015/2015ONCA0699.pdf

 

Questions About This Article?

We'd be happy to discuss!

Contact Kadey at
416.969.3436
or email at
kschultz@schultzlawgroup.ca

 

CONTACT US

Main Phone
416.969.3434
866.233.0977

Fax
416.969.3435

General Email

LinkedIn

JOIN OUR TEAM

Learn more about Schultz Law Group LLP.

Get in touch

Terms of Use